#FREE PEPAKURA UNFOLDER MOVIE#
And even then the pep model would still have differences in it, just as your sculpt has differences from the movie used ones. The only difference I can see is the medium. Did you not use reference photos to make your sculpt? Is that not the same thing as a pep modeler using your photos as a reference? Its not like they can plug some different angled shots into a computer and hit the " Make 3D" button. I dont belive it would be with any other either."
#FREE PEPAKURA UNFOLDER FOR FREE#
Then to shortly after se the pepakura file maker offer it for free and tell that anyone can use it to what they want. And even then no 2 people put the same pep file together the same way. was done to it, it would be a complete "recast" of what the modeler/unfolder did, but no one does that. I suppose if someone cast a pep piece after it was folded but no detail work/sanding ect. TMP I think your logic on this is flawed. I also agree its just common courtesy to ask permission. Well I am glad to hear that people who do the modeling share my stance one it. I hope this make sence from the sculptors point of stance. I dont belive it would be with any other either. I know if we made a CUSTOM sculpt and shown it from all angles that could been replicated with Pepakura 3D programs in a day. I do in fact look forward seeing allot of these suits finished.īut we have to have guidelines of this, one or the other way. I dont intend to offend any papakura makers, because i do admire their dedication and hard work. If this was charged for we would probalby say it was LINES CAST OF. The big difference is that the file is offerd for free. The pep file have primarly followed the original lines. This is one of the reasons the Warmachine was adopted so fast due to Hottoys/ Sideshow Photos showing it from all the angles. Because they can take and outline the details by lines from ANY photo reffrence and turn it into a 3D. Pepakura falls in a category that is hard to pinpoint. The instant the peices is moulded to make several casts it becomes a "recast" peice in my opinion.
The moment the armor is moulded to replicate and offerd it is regarded as modified recast peice. If an existing prop, licened or fanmade is altered, modified or resculpted on top of an existing peice and it is not made moulds of to recast it is considerd as a personal project. If we dont put any drawn lines on this, how can we draw lines on the other creations out there beeing modified and copied. I think i have to agree with stance on this. They are a great start and the people who made them are heroes of our community, but it still takes time and skill, sweat and tears of the builder to make them and finish out the details, and if they want to make and sell copies of their work(as long as they acknowldge the person(s) who made the pep file) that is their right.
It takes tons of skill and time to translate stefan's plans into the real world and no two "stefan accurate" packs are the same. Now just because you have access to these plans does not mean that you are capable of making great bucks or molds. He put in hours and hours of work to make the best possible refrences for all of us to use, and then put it up on the internet for free. Most people agree that they are the best plans for building a proton pack, and almost everyone who sells pack shells uses his plans for their build. Anyone who has done any Ghostbuster propping has heard the term "Stefan's plans". My stance is that yes it is ok and Ill give an example. I am really curious to hear peoples opinion on this.
0 kommentar(er)
